To your question ....Agree with the other men, if those terms had been agreed too then the issue I would have is that I lost. Otherwise if I did not agree better believe I will be getting out from under him, a quick bridge should displace him but can chain that with other motions to clear the issue and the match is over. I know it seems harsh but wrestling with someone requires a level of trust and once that trust is gone I can no longer feel comfortable placing my well-being in their hands
So you lost the fight, and per pre fight stakes,you now are pinned, your rivals balls and cock being ground into your face while the winner raises his arms in victory, humping you with his manhood, but he turns the tide, grabs your hair, attempting to get his cock in your mouth, you resist, but he persists, and your pinned beneath him, he has control. Your straight, he's bi, or gay. You've never had a cock in your mouth. Is this only a dilemma for a straight guy, or would it be an issue for another bi or gay? Would this be a welcome situation for some?
I definitely agree. I would add that accepting certain stakes, then backing out when you lose, is definitely a betrayal of trust in and of itself. I do at times agree to any stakes you can take during a fight. The, winner's choice after. It just adds a level of intensity.
In my case, I would say as long as it was agreed on before meeting up then it should be fine. In my case, since I never had a cock in my mouth, it would give me an incentive to try to win and accept my fate when losing.
TX bull (21 )
25/8/2020 05:35To your question ....Agree with the other men, if those terms had been agreed too then the issue I would have is that I lost. Otherwise if I did not agree better believe I will be getting out from under him, a quick bridge should displace him but can chain that with other motions to clear the issue and the match is over. I know it seems harsh but wrestling with someone requires a level of trust and once that trust is gone I can no longer feel comfortable placing my well-being in their hands
IOWA SUBMISSION (1)
23/8/2020 17:18So you lost the fight, and per pre fight stakes,you now are pinned, your rivals balls and cock being ground into your face while the winner raises his arms in victory, humping you with his manhood, but he turns the tide, grabs your hair, attempting to get his cock in your mouth, you resist, but he persists, and your pinned beneath him, he has control. Your straight, he's bi, or gay. You've never had a cock in your mouth. Is this only a dilemma for a straight guy, or would it be an issue for another bi or gay? Would this be a welcome situation for some?
matmansk (3)
27/8/2020 00:48(em resposta à...)
It should be an issue. Stakes = level of consent. Beyond that, that's an issue regardless of straight/bi/gay.
BrawlerNV (3)
28/8/2020 13:19(em resposta à...)
I definitely agree. I would add that accepting certain stakes, then backing out when you lose, is definitely a betrayal of trust in and of itself. I do at times agree to any stakes you can take during a fight. The, winner's choice after. It just adds a level of intensity.
Combatsportsfun (4)
24/8/2020 17:47(em resposta à...)
In my case, I would say as long as it was agreed on before meeting up then it should be fine. In my case, since I never had a cock in my mouth, it would give me an incentive to try to win and accept my fate when losing.
BamaJDon41 (10 )
24/8/2020 07:47(em resposta à...)
If I didn't agree to those stakes I would consider that a real problem. If I had wanted his cock in my mouth I would have agreed to those terms.